Carol Ann Brayley, MSW, RSW, SEP
26 Jun
26Jun


If you've been researching the Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP), you've probably noticed that people can have dramatically different experiences.

Some people listen to 30 minutes in one day and feel wonderful.

Others feel overwhelmed after only a few minutes - or even a few seconds.

Neither experience is wrong.

One of the biggest predictors of how someone experiences SSP isn't simply how much they listen. It's how prepared their nervous system is for the experience and whether the pacing matches what that particular nervous system needs.

Over the years, I've come to specialize in working with people whose nervous systems are especially sensitive or complex. For many of these individuals, going slower isn't a setback—it can actually be the fastest path to success.


What do I mean by a "sensitive" or "complex" nervous system?

These aren't formal diagnostic terms.

Rather, they're a way of describing nervous systems that may react more intensely to internal or external change.

This might include people with:

  • complex trauma or developmental trauma
  • dissociation
  • autism
  • ADHD
  • sensory processing differences
  • chronic illness
  • fibromyalgia
  • POTS or dysautonomia
  • long COVID
  • ME/CFS
  • hypermobility
  • mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS)
  • concussion history or brain injury
  • chronic stress or burnout
  • highly sensitive nervous systems—even without a formal diagnosis

Many people have several of these factors at the same time.


Why doesn't one schedule work for everyone?

The Safe and Sound Protocol was designed to support regulation of the autonomic nervous system.

Like any intervention that influences physiology, however, there is tremendous individual variation in how people respond.

Some nervous systems readily integrate change.

Others benefit from much smaller doses with plenty of time in between for the body to absorb what is happening.

In my clinical experience, trying to force every nervous system into the same listening schedule can sometimes make the process more difficult than it needs to be.

This doesn't mean the protocol isn't working.

Sometimes it simply means the pace needs to better match the nervous system.


Established guidance versus my clinical observations

It's important to distinguish between what comes from official SSP guidance and what comes from my own clinical experience.

Established guidance includes:

  • SSP should be individualized.
  • Providers should monitor responses.
  • Listening can be paused when appropriate.
  • Regulation and safety are important throughout the process.

My clinical observations, developed through working with many highly sensitive and medically complex clients, include:

  • Some people do better with listening measured in seconds - at least on some stages of the protocol.
  • More listening is not always better.
  • Allowing plenty of time for integration can sometimes produce smoother progress than pushing forward.
  • Tiny improvements often appear before bigger changes become obvious.

These observations reflect my own clinical experience rather than formal research studies.


Who may benefit from especially careful pacing?

Although everyone is different, I often find myself introducing SSP more gradually for people who have:

  • extensive trauma histories
  • significant sensory sensitivity
  • chronic health conditions
  • multiple neurodevelopmental differences
  • histories of becoming overwhelmed by other therapies
  • previous difficult experiences with SSP or other nervous system interventions

This doesn't mean these individuals cannot benefit from SSP.In fact, many of my most complex clients experience profound improvements.It simply means we may begin differently.


What does "going slower" actually look like?

People sometimes imagine that slowing down means making little progress.

Often, it simply means adjusting variables such as:

  • listening duration
  • listening frequency
  • timing within the day
  • environmental conditions
  • whether additional regulation strategies are used alongside listening
  • when to pause and allow the nervous system to integrate

There is no prize for finishing SSP quickly.

The goal is helping your nervous system successfully integrate the experience.


How do you know the pace feels right?

Sometimes the changes are surprisingly subtle.

You might notice:

  • sleeping slightly better
  • recovering from stress more quickly
  • feeling calmer around other people
  • less muscle tension
  • fewer startle responses
  • improved digestion
  • increased curiosity
  • moments of feeling more present
  • feeling just a little more like yourself

These are often the kinds of changes people overlook at first.

I wrote more about these subtle shifts here:

Tiny Signs of Nervous System Regulation



What if things feel like too much?

Temporary increases in symptoms do not automatically mean something has gone wrong.

However, they can sometimes be a sign that the nervous system would benefit from slowing down.

Depending on the individual, this might include:

  • feeling consistently overwhelmed after listening
  • prolonged increases in anxiety
  • persistent headaches
  • increased sensory overload
  • significant sleep disruption
  • feeling "wired" for extended periods
  • needing much longer than expected to recover after each session

These experiences don't necessarily mean SSP isn't appropriate.

Often, they simply tell us that we need to adjust the pace.


What is an experienced SSP provider watching for?

Listening time is only one piece of the puzzle.

Throughout the process, I'm also paying attention to questions such as:

  • How quickly does the nervous system recover after listening?
  • Are signs of regulation gradually increasing?
  • Is the person becoming more resilient over time?
  • Are symptoms short-lived or accumulating?
  • Does the nervous system appear ready for the next step?

Those observations often guide pacing far more than the calendar does.


Why my approach doesn't follow a rigid schedule

Some providers primarily follow a standard listening schedule.

That works very well for some people.

My practice has naturally evolved in a different direction because of the people who seek me out.

Many have already tried SSP elsewhere.

Many have complex medical conditions.

Many are exceptionally sensitive.

Rather than asking the nervous system to fit a schedule, I prefer to let the nervous system help determine the schedule.

Sometimes that means moving quite quickly.

Sometimes it means progressing one tiny step at a time.In my experience, respecting the nervous system often leads to a smoother, more sustainable process.


Choosing an SSP provider

Not every provider works the same way.

Some specialize in children.

Some primarily integrate SSP into psychotherapy.

Others, like me, focus heavily on pacing, complex presentations, and supporting highly sensitive nervous systems.

When choosing a provider, it can be helpful to ask:

  • How do you individualize pacing?
  • What happens if someone becomes overwhelmed?
  • How do you decide when to pause?
  • Do you have experience working with people with presentations similar to mine?

Finding a provider whose approach fits your nervous system can make a meaningful difference.

If you're wondering what else to consider when choosing someone to guide your process, you may also find these articles helpful:


Final thoughts

One of the most common things I tell new clients is this:

Your nervous system isn't failing if it needs a different pace.

Sensitive nervous systems are not "doing SSP wrong."

They're simply giving us information.

When we listen to that information with curiosity rather than judgment, the process often becomes gentler - and ultimately more successful.

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.